HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1998

HKSAR v. TAM KWOK PUI

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
19704-EN-1999-03-05

HKSAR v. TAM KWOK PUI

HTML content

HCMA001197/1998

HCMA1197/98

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 1197 OF 1998

---------------

BETWEEN
HKSARRespondent
AND
TAM KWOK PUIAppellant

---------------

Coram : Hon Woo J. in Court

Date of hearing : 5 March 1999

Date of judgment : 5 March 1999

------------------------

J U D G M E N T

------------------------

 

1. The Appellant pleaded guilty to a charge of possession of forged identity card and was sentenced by the Magistrate to 15 months' imprisonment. In passing sentence, the Magistrate took into account R v Chan Ming, CA 353/83 (6th May 1983, unreported).

2. Despite the previous convictions of the Appellant appearing in the record, the Magistrate treated the Appellant as a person with a clear record, and he considered that there was nothing in the Appellant's circumstances to allow him to depart from the tariff set down by Chan Ming.

3. The Appellant has submitted a piece of paper to me during this appeal which states that his father has died during his incarceration this time and his wife is seriously ill.

4. Although I am very sympathetic with the Appellant, I do not see any ground in disturbing the sentence which was passed by the Magistrate after considering the relevant authorities and guidelines, nor do I find the sentence excessive. I would dismiss the appeal.

(K.H. Woo)
Judge of the Court of First Instance, High Court

Representation:

Mr William Lam, SGC of DPP, for HKSAR

Appellant in person, present