HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1998

HKSAR v. LO TAK WAI

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
37357-EN-1999-02-25

HKSAR v. LO TAK WAI

HTML content

HCMA001259/1998

HCMA1259/98

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 1259 OF 1998

-------------

BETWEEN
HKSARRespondent
AND
LO TAK WAIAppellant

--------------

Coram : Hon Woo J. in Court

Date of hearing : 25 February 1999

Date of delivery of judgment : 25 February 1999

------------------------

J U D G M E N T

------------------------

 

1. The Appellant's appeal against conviction must be dismissed as he had admitted before the Magistrate the possession of tablets of estazolam as charged. Lack of knowledge that the drug is a prohibited or dangerous drug can be no defence.

2. There is no appeal against sentence and I do not think it proper to enter into any consideration in matters relating to sentence.

(K.H. Woo)
Judge of the Court of First Instance, High Court

Representation:

Miss Denise Chan, S.G.C. of DPP, for the HKSAR

Mr Lo Tak Wai, Appellant in person, Present