HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1998

HKSAR v. NGUYEN THI LIEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
17398-EN-1998-04-29

HKSAR v. NGUYEN THI LIEN

HTML content

HCMA000143/1998

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 143 OF 1998

-------------

BETWEEN
HKSARRespondent
AND
NGUYEN THI LIENAppellant

--------------

 

Coram : Hon Mr Justice Cheung in Court

Date of hearing : 29 April 1998

Date of delivery of judgment : 29 April 1998

------------------------

J U D G M E N T

------------------------

 

1. The Appellant pleaded guilty to one charge of remaining in Hong Kong without authority of the Director of Immigration after having landed unlawfully in Hong Kong.

2. The Appellant is a Vietnamese and came to Hong Kong illegally. She was sentenced to 15 months' imprisonment. It is clear from the guidelines as reviewed in the case of R. v. Nguyen Van Doan M.A. 1478 of 1996 that a 15 months' sentence of imprisonment is appropriate. The sentence is intended to be a deterrent sentence.

3. What the Appellant said regarding her medical conditions and personal background, namely her husband had left her and she had to take care of her two children at home, are not grounds for departing from the guideline.

4. In the circumstances the appeal is dismissed.

Representation:

Mr Cheung Wai Sun, Deputy Principal Government Counsel, for Director of Public Prosecutions

Appellant in person

(P. Cheung)
Judge of the Court of First Instance,
High Court