HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1998

HKSAR v. Gulapa Adelaida

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
37051-EN-1998-05-28

HKSAR v. Gulapa Adelaida

HTML content

HCMA000246/1998

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 246 OF 1998

_______________

BETWEEN
HKSARRespondent
AND
Gulapa AdelaidaAppellant

________________

 

Coram: The Hon. Madam Justice Beeson in Court

Date of Hearing: 28 May 1998

Date of Delivery of Judgment: 28 May 1998

________________

J U D G M E N T

________________

 

1. The Appellant appeals against sentences imposed in the Magistracy on charges of Theft (a shoplifting) and a breach of a Deportation Order. In respect of the charge of theft she was sentenced to 6 months' imprisonment and in respect of the breach of Deportation Order she was sentenced to 15 months' imprisonment; the Magistrate ordered that those sentences ran concurrently.

2. The Magistrate adopted 18 months as the starting point for his sentence on the breach of Deportation Order; this was the third breach of a deportation order by this Appellant. She had 6 other aliases by which she was known in Hong Kong and they appear on her Criminal Record Summary. The theft was a serious shoplifting involving a large quantity of shirts taken from a chain store in Hong Kong. It appears from her record and antecedents that this Appellant comes to Hong Kong for the purposes of theft.

3. The sentences are entirely proper. I see no reason to interfere with the Magistrate's sentence in either case and in fact I add 2 months to the sentence in respect of the Theft to be consecutive to the other sentence. This is an entirely unmeritorious appeal; it is dismissed.

Representation:

Paul Ho, S.G.C., for DPP

Gulapa Adelaida, Appellant, in person

(C.M. Beeson)
Judge of the Court of First Instance