HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1998

HKSAR v. TSANG SUET WA

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
32710-EN-1998-07-31

HKSAR v. TSANG SUET WA

HTML content

HCMA000426/1998

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

MAGISTRACY CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 426 of 1998

(On appeal from WSCC 4449 of 1998)

____________

BETWEEN
HKSARRespondent
AND
TSANG SUET WAAppellant

____________

 

Coram : The Honourable Mrs Justice V. Bokhary in Court

Date of Hearing: 31 July 1998

Date of Judgment: 31 July 1998

 

______________

J U D G M E N T

______________

1. The Appellant a woman in her twenties appeared before P.C. White Esquire in the Magistrate's Court sitting at Western on 15th April this year and pleaded guilty to one charge of using an unlawfully obtained travel document; one charge of making a false representation to an immigration assistant; and one charge of making a false statement for the purpose of obtaining a document of identity. She was sentenced to two months' imprisonment on each charge concurrent but suspended for two years. She was also fined $1,000.00 on each charge. She now appeals against her sentences.

2. Mr Harris who appears on behalf of the Appellant does not appear to be pursuing the two grounds of appeal set out in the perfected grounds of appeal. Instead he tells me that the Appellant has just got married and is planing to emigrate to Australia with her new husband, and that the suspended sentence imposed upon her by the Magistrate has devastating consequences upon her. He asked this Court to temper justice with mercy in this case.

3. Having considered all the circumstances of this case and counsel's submission, I am persuaded that I should do that in light of the fresh circumstances. I must say at once that this implies no criticism of the Magistrate. I think that if the fresh circumstances had been before him, he would have done what I am now going to do: which is to leave this woman to be punished by way of a fine and of course the ordeal of having had to appear in court which would have been a lesson and warning to her.

4. The suspended sentence imposed by the Magistrate is set aside and the appeal is allowed to that extent accordingly.

Representation:

Mr Wesley Wong (of the Department of Justice) for the Respondent

Mr Graham Harris (instructed by M/s Ng & Fang) for the Appellant

(V. Bokhary)
Judge of the Court of First Instance,
High Court