HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1998

HKSAR v. HUNG WA WAI

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
35271-EN-1999-01-07

HKSAR v. HUNG WA WAI

HTML content

HCMA000707/1998

HCMA 707/98

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

APPELLATE JURISDICTION

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 707 OF 1998

____________

BETWEEN
HKSARRespondent
AND
HUNG WA WAIAppellant

____________

Coram: Deputy Judge Jackson in Court

Date of Hearing: 7 January 1999

Date of Judgment: 7 January 1999

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

 

1. On 3rd July 1998 at North Kowloon Magistrates Court this appellant was convicted after trial of an offence of managing a vice-establishment. He was sentenced to a term of 4 months' imprisonment.

2. This appeal came before me this morning as an appeal against conviction only. It became plain that the appellant had no grounds of appeal against conviction whatsoever. Indeed he conceded that his conviction was correct and that all he was seeking was a reduction in sentence. That being so I granted the appellant leave to appeal against sentence out of time and treated this hearing as that appeal.

3. The appellants only grounds of appeal against sentence are firstly that his mother has recently had a heart operation and needs his assistance at home and secondly that when he started work at the vice-establishment he understood that all that he would be required to do was to act as a cleaner.

4. The sentence imposed upon the appellant by the learned Magistrate cannot be faulted and the appellant has presented no convincing reasons before me why that sentence should be reduced.

5. The appeals against both conviction and sentence are accordingly dismissed.

(C. G. Jackson)
Deputy Judge of the Court of First Instance

Representation:

Mr. Albert Wong, SGC for HKSAR/DPP.

Mr. Hung Wa Wai, Appellant in Person.