HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1998

HKSAR v. CHAN CHING HOI

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
23691-EN-1999-01-08

HKSAR v. CHAN CHING HOI

HTML content

HCMA000775/1998

HCMA 775/98

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 775 OF 1998

____________

BETWEEN
HKSAR
AND
CHAN CHING HOIAppellant

____________

Coram: Deputy Judge Jackson in Court

Date of Hearing: 8 January 1999

Date of Judgment: 8 January 1999

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

 

1. This is an appeal against conviction and sentence. Following his guilty plea to two offences of remaining in Hong Kong without authority of the Director of Immigration and of making a false representation to an Immigration Officer the appellant was sentenced to concurrent terms of 12 months and 3 months imprisonment.

2. Before me the appellant has sought to say that he only pleaded guilty to these offences because his counsel in the court below advised him that he would only be fined and that in fact he is not guilty of the offences.

3. I have endeavoured at two hearings to ascertain precisely what it is that the appellant is now saying. It seems that he is saying that he received a Hong Kong Entry permit in 1979 and that he has not left Hong Kong since that date. On the information before me, helpfully provided by Mr Wong Counsel for the prosecution, that simply is not true.

4. There is no merit whatsoever in the appellant's appeal against conviction. His pleas of guilty before the learned Magistrate were not equivocal; they were tendered with the benefit of what I have no doubt was the very proper advice of counsel.

5. As to the sentences for these offences the learned Magistrate set out fully his reasons for them and he cannot be faulted in these reasons.

6. The appeal against sentence must accordingly also be dismissed.

(C.G. Jackson)
Deputy Judge of the Court of First Instance

Representation:

Mr Wesley W C Wong, SADPP (Ag) for HKSAR/DPP

Mr Chan Ching-hoi, Appellant in Person