HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1998

HKSAR v. LO HOI MING

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
17372-EN-1998-03-24

HKSAR v. LO HOI MING

HTML content

HCMA000008/1998

 

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 8 OF 1998

(On appeal from NKC 4383 of 1997)

____________

BETWEEN
HKSARRespondent
AND
LO HOI MINGAppellant

____________

 

Coram: The Honourable Mrs Justice V. Bokhary in Court

Date of Hearing: 24 March 1998

Date of Judgment: 24 March 1998

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

1. On the 17th November 1997, the Appellant, a man in his late 20's, was convicted after trial by K. A. Browne, Esquire sitting in the Magistrate's Court at North Kowloon on one charge of trafficking in dangerous drugs. A background report was called for; and on 8th December 1997, he was sentenced to two years' imprisonment.

2. He now appeals against his conviction and has set out his grounds of appeal in a statement attached to the pro-forma Notice of Appeal.

3. The Magistrate has prepared a very detailed Statement of Findings. Having considered all the evidence and the grounds advanced by the Appellant, I propose to say no more than that I am fully satisfied of the propriety of the conviction.

4. The appeal is dismissed.

Representation:

Mr. F. A. Veltro, S.G.C. for Respondent.

Appellant, Lo Hoi Ming, present in person.

(V. Bokhary)
Judge of the Court of First Instance,
High Court