HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1999

HKSAR v. CHEUNG SIK WAI TERRY

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
34403-EN-1999-11-23

HKSAR v. CHEUNG SIK WAI TERRY

HTML content

HCMA001020/1999

HCMA 1020/1999

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. HCMA 1020 OF 1999

(On Appeal from NKCC 5051/99)

____________

BETWEEN
HKSARRespondent
AND
CHEUNG SIK WAI TERRYAppellant

____________

Coram: The Hon. Madam Justice Beeson in Court

Date of Hearing: 23 November 1999

Date of Judgment: 23 November 1999

______________

J U D G M E N T

______________

 

1. This Appellant was sentenced, after pleading guilty, in respect of three charges: Driving in Excess of the Speed Limit; Driving Whilst Disqualified and Using a Vehicle Without Third Party Insurance. In respect of the driving whilst disqualified, the Defendant was sentenced to 4 months imprisonment and against that sentence of imprisonment he now appeals. The maximum penalty for that offence is a fine of $10,000 and imprisonment for 12 months.

2. The Magistrate in sentencing took all matters into consideration and he also noted this Appellant's shocking driving record. This offence was committed only 9 months after Appellant had been given a suspended sentence of 2 months suspended for 36 months for an identical offence. That suspended sentence was activated, as it should have been, and ordered to run consecutively to this sentence. Clearly Appellant adopts a cavalier attitude both to road regulations and the penalties imposed on him by the court.

3. Having examined the Magistrate's Reasons for Sentence I can see no justification for either allowing this appeal, or for varying the sentence of imprisonment which was so properly passed. The appeal is dismissed.

(C-M. Beeson)
Judge of the Court of First Instance

Representation:

Mr. P.K. Madigan, S.G.C. for D.P.P.

CHEUNG Sik-wai Terry, Appellant, in person