HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1999

HKSAR v. LAM HON PING

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
20118-EN-1999-05-14

HKSAR v. LAM HON PING

HTML content

HCMA000296/1999

1999, No. MA 296

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 296 OF 1999

____________

BETWEEN
HKSARRespondent
AND
LAM HON PINGAppellant

____________

Coram: The Honourable Mrs Justice V. Bokhary in Court

Date of Hearing: 14 May 1999

Date of Delivery of Judgment: 14 May 1999

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

 

1. This Appellant, a youth of 20, pleaded guilty to one charge of theft and was sentenced to be detained in a Training Centre by D. L. Duggan Esq. sitting at the San Po Kong Magistracy. He now appeals against sentence on the ground that his sentence is too severe.

2. In all the circumstances, I do not consider that the sentence is too severe at all. Indeed, I consider that the sentence is appropriate in all the circumstances.

3. Accordingly, the appeal against sentence is dismissed.

(V. Bokhary)
Judge of the Court of First Instance,
High Court

Representation:

Mr Lam Hon-ping, Appellant in person

Mr Gary Lam (of the Department of Justice) for the Respondent