HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1999

HKSAR v. LAM KIT LIN, KATHLEEN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
20477-EN-1999-12-17

HKSAR v. LAM KIT LIN, KATHLEEN

HTML content

HCMA000651/1999

HCMA 651/1999

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO.651 OF 1999

(ON APPEAL FROM WSS 7786/1999)

----------------------

BETWEEN
HKSARRespondent
AND
LAM KIT LIN, KATHLEENAppellant

-----------------------

Coram: Hon Nguyen J in Court

Date of Hearing: 17 December 1999

Date of Judgment: 17 December 1999

 

-------------------------

J U D G M E N T

-------------------------

 

1. The appeal against conviction is dismissed. In my view, there was sufficient evidence for the Magistrate to have found the Appellant guilty and I find there is nothing in ground 2, which was the allegation that there was a material irregularity in the trial because counsel was stopped from cross-examining PW1 on the cost of repair to PW1's vehicle. That was a matter which was not relevant to the driving charge and so the Magistrate was quite entitled to stop counsel from pursuing that particular line of cross-examination.

 

 

(Peter Nguyen)
Judge of the Court of First Instance,
High Court

 

Representation:

Mr Tam Sze Lok, SGC of the Department of Justice, for HKSAR

Mr Chris Cheng, instructed by Messrs M.K. Lam & Co., for the Appellant