HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1999

HKSAR v. WU SAN FAI

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
23038-EN-1999-09-21

HKSAR v. WU SAN FAI

HTML content

HCMA000753/1999

HCMA753/99

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO.753 OF 1999

--------------

BETWEEN
HKSARRespondent
AND
WU SAN FAIAppellant

--------------

Coram : Hon Woo J in Court

Date of hearing : 21 September 1999

Date of judgment : 21 September 1999

---------------------

J U D G M E N T

---------------------

 

1. The Appellant pleaded guilty before a Magistrate to remaining in Hong Kong without the authority of the Director of Immigration after having landed unlawfully in Hong Kong.

2. When he was considering sentence, the Magistrate was shown the Appellant's record showing that he had three previous convictions for the same offence, one in July 1996, one in January 1997 and the last one in March 1998. Following the case of the R v So Man King and Others [1989] 1 HKLR 142, the Magistrate sentenced the Appellant to 18 months' imprisonment. His decision is nothing but proper.

3. Before the Magistrate, the Appellant was represented by a duty lawyer. After mentioning the personal circumstances of the Appellant to the Magistrate, Counsel specifically mentioned that there was no humanitarian ground for the Magistrate to consider.

4. Attached to the Notice of Appeal, is a letter of the Appellant which mentioned that his parents were sick and before me, he reiterates that his parents are aged and sick and asks me to reduce his sentence to send him home early. However, he has not been able to produce any medical certificate or any sufficient proof to support his ground.

5. I am not persuaded that in such circumstances there are sufficient materials for the Court to reduce the sentence on humanitarian grounds. I therefore dismiss the appeal.

(K.H. Woo)
Judge of the Court of First Instance,
High Court

Representation:

Mr Man Tak-ho Jonathan, G.C. of D.P.P., for HKSAR

Appellant in person, Present