HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1999

HKSAR v. CHI PUI KIN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
37208-EN-1999-05-11

HKSAR v. CHI PUI KIN

HTML content

HCMA000084/1999

1999, No. MA84

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(APPELLATE JURISDICTION)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 84 OF 1999

____________

BETWEEN
HKSARRespondent
AND
CHI PUI KINAppellant

____________

Coram : The Honourable Mrs Justice V. Bokhary in Court

Date of Hearing: 11 May 1999

Date of Delivery of Judgment: 11 May 1999

 

______________

J U D G M E N T

______________

 

1. The Appellant was charged with one count of theft. On 9th December 1998 she appeared before Stephen Smout Esquire in the Magistrate's Court at San Po Kong. She was convicted after trial and was fined $1,500.00.

2. The Appellant now appeals against conviction. She has lodged a Notice of Appeal against Conviction in the standard form but has written no ground of appeal thereon.

3. The Magistrate had prepared a very detailed Statement of Findings after carefully considering all the evidence. Suffice it to say that I am fully satisfied of the propriety of the conviction. The appeal against conviction is therefore dismissed.

(V. Bokhary)
Judge of the Court of First Instance,
High Court

Representation:

Ms CHI Pui-kin, Appellant in person

Mr Paul K. Madigan (of the Department of Justice) for the Respondent