HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal1999

HKSAR v. WONG TAI WAI

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
21523-EN-2000-11-17

HKSAR v. WONG TAI WAI

HTML content

HCMA000899/1999

HCMA 899/1999

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 899 OF 1999

(ON APPEAL FROM SPCC 2705/1999)

_______________

BETWEEN
HKSARRespondent
AND
WONG TAI WAIAppellant

________________

Coram: Hon V. Bokhary J in Court

Date of Hearing: 17 November 2000

Date of Judgment: 17 November 2000

 

________________

J U D G M E N T

________________

 

1. The appellant appeared before Stephen Smout, Esquire sitting at the Magistrate's Court at San Po Kong on one charge of reckless driving. He was convicted after trial of the lesser offence of careless driving and was fined $3,000.00. He now appeals against his conviction.

2. Mr Ng, counsel representing the appellant, has submitted that the Magistrate had failed to give sufficient consideration or at all to the evidence in relation to the issues of identification, credibility and reliability of prosecution witnesses and that the Magistrate had made a number of errors in addressing those issues so as to render the conviction unsafe and unsatisfactory.

3. I have considered Mr Ng's submission with great care. Having regard to the evidence and the Magistrate's approach and findings, I am satisfied that his conclusion on those issues is not one which I can properly disturb.

4. The appeal is therefore dismissed.

 

 

(V. Bokhary)
Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court

 

Representation:

Mr Edmond Lee, SGC of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent

Mr Ken Ng Kin Man, instructed by Messrs Ivan Tang & Co., for the Appellant