HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal2000

HKSAR v. LAI KWAI SHING

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
4226-EN-2000-04-14

HKSAR v. LAI KWAI SHING

HTML content

CACC000043/2000

CACC 43/2000

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 43 OF 2000

(ON APPEAL FROM DCCC 1100/1999)

__________________

BETWEEN
HKSARRespondent
AND
LAI KWAI SHINGApplicant

________________

Coram: Hon Mayo VP and Leong JA in Court

Date of Hearing: 14 April 2000

Date of Judgment: 14 April 2000

 

______________

J U D G M E N T

______________

 

Mayo JA (giving the judgment of the Court):

1. The applicant pleaded guilty to trafficking in a dangerous drug before Judge Day in the District Court and was sentenced to 4 years imprisonment. The particulars of the offence were:

"Particulars of Offence

LAI Kwai-shing and FUNG Kam-lin, on the 14th day of October, 1999, at Room 1, 2nd Floor, No. 34, Wood Road, Wanchai, in Hong Kong, unlawfully trafficked in a dangerous drug, namely, 47.27 grammes of a mixture containing 17.45 grammes of heroin hydrochloride."

2. The Judge adopted a starting point of 6 years imprisonment. This was in conformity with the tariff laid down in R v LAU Tak-ming [1990] 2 HKLR 370 for this offence.

3. The applicant has prayed in aid his difficult family circumstances. The sentencing Judge was aware of these. In a case as serious as this little weight can be given to personal circumstances.

4. The applicant referred to another case which had been reported in the press where the Court of Appeal had reduced a sentence in relation to an offence of trafficking in a dangerous drug. The circumstances of all cases are different and very little assistance can be derived from the sentences which have been imposed in other cases.

5. The sentence was in no way manifestly excessive or wrong in principle. The application is dismissed. As the application is devoid of merit we order that 2 months of the time that the applicant has spent in custody will not count towards the sentence he is serving.

 

 

(Simon Mayo)

(Arthur Leong)

Vice-PresidentJustice of Appeal

 

Representation:

Mr P K Madigan, SGC, of the Department of Justice, for the respondent

Lai Kwai-shing, applicant in person