HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Miscellaneous Proceedings (Criminal)2000

TANG YEE LUT v. HKSAR

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
22931-EN-2000-09-08

TANG YEE LUT v. HKSAR

HTML content

FAMC000014/2000

Not for circulation
FAMC No. 14 of 2000

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 14 OF 2000 (CRIMINAL)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL

FROM CACC NO. 325 OF 1999)

_____________________

Between:
TANG YEE LUTApplicant
AND
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGIONRespondent

_____________________

Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Bokhary PJ, Mr Justice Chan PJ and Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ

Date of Hearing: 8 September 2000

Date of Determination: 8 September 2000

 

_________________________

DETERMINATION

_________________________

 

Mr Justice Chan PJ:

1. Leave to appeal is sought on the ground of substantial and grave injustice. We do not consider that there is any reasonably arguable case of substantial and grave injustice.

2. The trial judge applied the guidelines in Turnbull. We think he is right to do so. The Court of Appeal doubted the applicability of the Turnbull principles in this case. We are unable to share such doubt.

3. The application is therefore dismissed.

 

 

(Kemal Bokhary)(Patrick Chan)(R.A.V. Ribeiro)
Permanent JudgePermanent JudgePermanent Judge

 

Representation:

Applicant in person

Mr Thomas Law, SADPP of Department of Justice for the Respondent