HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Miscellaneous Proceedings (Criminal)2000

CHU SIK CHOR AND ANOTHER v. HKSAR

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
18454-ET-2000-05-09

CHU SIK CHOR AND ANOTHER v. HKSAR

HTML content

FAMC000004/2000

(Not for Circulation)
FAMC No. 4 of 2000

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 4 OF 2000 (CRIMINAL)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL

FROM HCMA No. 584 OF 1999)

_____________________

Between:
CHU SIK CHOR1st Applicant
MA YUET YING2nd Applicant
AND
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGIONRespondent

_____________________

Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Litton PJ, Mr Justice Ching PJ and Mr Justice Bokhary PJ

Date of Hearing: 9 May 2000

Date of Determination: 9 May 2000

 

___________________________

DETERMINATION

___________________________

 

Mr Justice Litton PJ:

1. There are two applicants before us, seeking leave to appeal against the dismissal of their appeals by Mr Justice Woo JA in the High Court.

2. They were convicted jointly on one charge of common assault in the Western Magistracy. Additionally, the first applicant was convicted of wilfully obstructing a police officer in the due execution of his duty.

3. The facts leading to these convictions have been carefully investigated in the two courts below. It is not the function of the Court of Final Appeal to review the facts all over again. The applicants have brought forward nothing this morning which would justify leave to bring an appeal to the Court of Final Appeal.

4. These applications are dismissed.

 

 

(Henry Litton)(Charles Ching)(Kemal Bokhary)
Permanent JudgePermanent JudgePermanent Judge

 

Representation:

Mr Chu Sik Chor, 1st Applicant, in person

Ms Ma Yuet Ying, 2nd Applicant, in person

Mr Arthur Luk and Mr Alex Lee (of Department of Justice) for the Respondent