CHAN YU CHAU v. FONG ON CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER
HTML content
CHAN YU CHAU v. FONG ON CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER
HTML content
CHAN YU CHAU v. FONG ON CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING CO. LTD.
HTML content
HCPI000753A/2000
HCPI753/2000
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
PERSONAL INJURIES ACTION NO. 753 OF 2000
____________
| BETWEEN | ||
| CHAN YU CHAU | Plaintiff | |
| AND | ||
| FONG ON CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED 晃安建築工程有限公司 | 1st Defendant | |
The Personal Representatives of YEUNG KIN KONG, deceased formerly known as YEUNG KWONG ENGINEERING COMPANY |
(By Original Writ)
____________
| AND BETWEEN | ||
| CHAN YU CHAU | Plaintiff | |
| AND | ||
| FONG ON CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED 晃安建築工程有限公司 | 1st Defendant | |
| YEUNG KIM HO, representing the Estate of YEUNG KIN KONG, deceased formerly known as YEUNG KWONG ENGINEERING COMPANY | 2nd Defendant | |
(appointed by Order of Master C B Chan dated 19 October 2000) | ||
(By Order of Master C B Chan to carry on proceedings | ||
| AND | ||
| EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION ASSISTANCE FUND BOARD | Intervenor | |
____________
Coram: Deputy High Court Judge Longley in Chambers
Dates of Hearing: 29 July 2002
Date of Judgment: 29 July 2002
_____________
R U L I N G
____________
1. The 1st Defendant applies for a stay of the judgment for the judgment sum until the determination of the appeal in this matter and/or further order of the Court.
2. The question of whether or not to grant a stay is entirely a matter for the discretion of the Court.
3. Having heard the arguments of counsel, I am not satisfied that this is an appropriate case for a stay to be granted.
4. While I do not go so far as to accept Mr Cheung's submissions that the appeal is not bona fide, the grounds as at present formulated are, to say the least, "thin".
5. Moreover even if the 1st Defendant was successful in the appeal, he is not left without further recourse even if the 2nd Defendant is insolvent. He could seek recovery of what he has paid from the Plaintiff but, even if not successful in this regard, he would receive protection at least as to the majority of his costs by reason of the fact that the Plaintiff is legally aided.
6. In so far as damages are concerned, the effect of the 1st Defendant being successful in the appeal would be to render the 2nd Defendant liable for the whole of the judgment sum. If the 1st Defendant has discharged the whole or part of that sum, he has a strong argument under legislation as now amended from recovering from the Intervenor any sum he has paid to discharge that liability.
7. The 1st Defendant thus failed to show that failure to grant the stay would result in this appeal if successful being nugatory.
8. I dismiss the application. I order that the 1st Defendant pay the Plaintiff's costs of this application. Notwithstanding the fact that the summons was addressed to all parties, I do not consider it would be just to make any order for costs in favour of the Intervenor.
| (P K M Longley) | |
| Deputy High Court Judge |
Representation:
Mr Simon Cheung of Messrs Simon Chueng & Co. (assigned by DLA), for the Plaintiff
Mr George Chu, instructed by Messrs P H Chin & Co., for the 1st Defendant
Ms Hilda Wong of Messrs P C Woo & Co. for the Intervenor
CHAN YU CHAU v. FONG ON CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING CO. LTD.
HTML content