HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal2001

HKSAR v. LIU KIM PO

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
1488-EN-2002-01-11

HKSAR v. LIU KIM PO

HTML content

CACC000178/2001

CACC 178/2001

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 178 OF 2001

(ON APPEAL FROM DCCC 43 OF 2001)

______________

BETWEEN
HKSARRespondent
AND
LIU KIM-POApplicant

______________

Coram: Hon Mayo VP in Court

Date of Hearing: 11 January 2002

Date of Judgment: 11 January 2002

_____________

J U D G M E N T

_____________

1. No satisfactory reason has been given for the delay in applying for leave to appeal against the sentence imposed. It is also apparent from the papers that even if leave were to be granted to proceed out of time there would be no prospect of success on the application. This is because the sentence which was imposed for this serious offence was in no way excessive. The application is accordingly dismissed.

(Simon Mayo)
Vice-President

Representation:

Ms Vinci Lam, GC, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent

Applicant in person