HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal2001

HKSAR v. LEE KIT YING, KITTY

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
2701-EN-2001-12-28

HKSAR v. LEE KIT YING, KITTY

HTML content

CACC000290/2001

CACC 290/2001

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 290 OF 2001

(ON APPEAL FROM DCCC 355 OF 2001)

______________

BETWEEN
HKSARRespondent
AND
LEE KIT-YING, KITTYApplicant

______________

Coram: Hon Mayo VP in Court

Date of Hearing: 28 December 2001

Date of Judgment: 28 December 2001

_____________

J U D G M E N T

_____________

1. This is a sad case. The applicant who worked as a doctor's assistant on ten occasions signed forms which purportedly were signed by the doctor to obtain medication which contained dangerous drugs as defined in the Ordinance. She pleaded guilty to all the offences and was sentenced to 2 years' imprisonment.

2. Taking all the circumstances into account it cannot be said that the sentences which were imposed were in any way excessive. Indeed it might be said that they were unduly lenient. However having regard to the strong mitigating factors and the applicant's previous good character the Judge's mercy is entirely understandable. The application has to be refused and is refused.

3. One other matter I would mention to the applicant is that although leave has been refused she can still proceed with an appeal but if she does so she would stand the risk of an order being made that part of the time she served in custody will not count towards her sentence as it might be considered that the appeal was entirely unmeritorious.

(Simon Mayo)
Vice-President

Representation:

Mr Gary Lam GC, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent

Applicant in person