HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal2002

HKSAR v. RIASAT ALI

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
441-EN-2002-07-23

HKSAR v. RIASAT ALI

HTML content

CACC000103/2002

CACC 103/2002

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 103 OF 2002

(ON APPEAL FROM DCCC 1097 OF 2001)

______________

BETWEEN
HKSARRespondent
AND
RIASAT ALIApplicant

______________

Coram: Hon Mayo VP in Court

Date of Hearing: 23 July 2002

Date of Judgment: 23 July 2002

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

1. There is no merit whatever in this application. There was ample evidence before the Judge to support this conviction.

2. The applicant has not advanced any convincing grounds in support of his application. The application for leave to appeal against conviction is accordingly dismissed.

(Simon Mayo)
Vice-President

Representation:

Ms Lynda M.A. Shine, SGC, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent.

Applicant in person.