HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal2002

HKSAR v. MAK YUN KEUNG

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
2318-EN-2002-09-03

HKSAR v. MAK YUN KEUNG

HTML content

CACC000254/2002

CACC 254/2002

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 254 OF 2002

(ON APPEAL FROM DCCC 254 OF 2002)

______________

BETWEEN
HKSARRespondent
AND
MAK YUN KEUNGApplicant

______________

Coram: Hon Mayo VP in Court

Date of Hearing: 3 September 2002

Date of Judgment: 3 September 2002

 

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

 

1. I have no doubt that the total sentence imposed was appropriate in all of the circumstances of the case. The main offence was the attempted burglary and there was ample reason for the Judge to treat the offence as a serious one. I am not prepared to grant leave to appeal against the sentences imposed.

(Simon Mayo)
Vice-President

Representation:

Mr Jackson Poon, SGC, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent.

Applicant in person.