HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal2002

HKSAR v. CHAN KAM WAH

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
6618-EN-2002-07-19

HKSAR v. CHAN KAM WAH

HTML content

CACC000070/2002

CACC 70/2002

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 70 OF 2002

(ON APPEAL FROM DCCC 800 OF 2001)

______________

BETWEEN
HKSARRespondent
AND
CHAN KAM-WAHApplicant

______________

Coram: Hon Mayo VP in Court

Date of Hearing: 19 July 2002

Date of Judgment: 19 July 2002

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

 

1. There was ample evidence before the Judge to support this conviction. The applicant has not advanced any grounds which are in any way convincing. The application for leave to appeal against conviction is dismissed.

2. The applicant's main grievance concerning the sentence imposed is that the Judge added six months to the starting point adopted of three years' imprisonment on account of the applicant's bad record. In this connection the Judge referred to twelve previous convictions. Mr Tso for the respondent has very helpfully pointed out that in fact the applicant only has four previous convictions which are relevant to the present offence. However this is still a bad record and the public is entitled to be protected from the deprivations of this applicant. While the sentence was a heavy one it was not in my view manifestly excessive. This application is also dismissed.

(Simon Mayo)
Vice-President

Representation:

Mr Simon Tso, SGC, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent.

Applicant in person.