HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal2002

HKSAR v. CHOI CHUN HUNG

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
7253-EN-2002-07-23

HKSAR v. CHOI CHUN HUNG

HTML content

CACC000084/2002

CACC 84/2002

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 84 OF 2002

(ON APPEAL FROM DCCC 847 OF 2001)

______________

BETWEEN
HKSARRespondent
AND
CHOI CHUN-HUNGApplicant

______________

Coram: Hon Mayo VP in Court

Date of Hearing: 23 July 2002

Date of Judgment: 23 July 2002

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

1. The matters raised by the applicant relate mainly to the circumstances surrounding the taking of the inculpatory statement the applicant made after his arrest. The circumstances were considered carefully by the Judge who was satisfied that it was a voluntary statement. There are no grounds to justify this court interfering with the Judge's findings.

2. The application for leave to appeal against conviction is dismissed.

(Simon Mayo)
Vice-President

Representation:

Ms Lynda M.A. Shine, SGC, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent.

Applicant in person.