HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal2002

HKSAR v. CHENG XIN NA

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
35446-EN-2002-05-08

HKSAR v. CHENG XIN NA

HTML content

HCMA000185/2002

HCMA185/2002

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO.185 OF 2002

(ON APPEAL FROM ESCC 3565 OF 2001)

-------------------------

 

BETWEEN
HKSARRespondent
AND
CHENG XIN NAAppellant

-------------------------

Coram : Deputy High Court Judge Wong in Court

Date of Hearing : 8 May 2002

Date of Judgment : 8 May 2002

-------------------------

J U D G M E N T

-------------------------

1. Having considered the written arguments in this case and having taken into account the concession made by Mr Dick who appears before this court for the Government, I reluctantly come to the conclusion that the conviction cannot be supported in view of the very fundamental error made by the magistrate on the standard of proof (see p.67 of the Appeal Bundle D-E. The mistake is fatal and cannot be cured by a subsequent correction at p.68 N-O).

2. The facts are quite simple, there is no need for me to repeat them here. In all the circumstances of the case, I have, with reluctance, to allow this appeal, quash the conviction and set aside the sentence.

( M. Wong )
Deputy Judge of the High Court

Representation:

Mr J.W. Dick, SGC for Director of Public Prosecutions, for the Respondent

Mr Osmond Lam, instructed by Messrs Ivan Tang & Co., for the Appellant