HKSAR v. SINGH KULDIP
HTML content
HCMA000362/2002
HCMA 362/2002
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 362 OF 2002
(ON APPEAL FROM ESCC 980/2002)
____________
| BETWEEN | ||
| HKSAR | Respondent | |
| AND | ||
| SINGH KULDIP | Appellant |
____________
Coram: Hon V. Bokhary J in Court
Date of Hearing: 14 June 2002
Date of Judgment: 14 June 2002
_______________
J U D G M E N T
_______________
1. This Appellant is an Indian in his early twenties. In February 2001 he was deported from Hong Kong. The deportation order served on him prohibited him from returning to Hong Kong. Nevertheless, he returned to Hong Kong in February this year. As a result, he was charged with breach of deportation order contrary to section 43(1)(a) of the Immigration Ordinance, Cap. 115.
2. On 1 April this year, he appeared before Mr W. C. Li in the Eastern Magistracy, pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 12 months' imprisonment. He now appeals against sentence.
3. The past cases show that such a sentence is at the lower end of the range for this type of offence after a guilty plea. There is no real mitigation in this case. It is a sad fact that the Appellant is unable to rely on his previous good character. He has urged me to reduce his sentence on humanitarian grounds saying that his wife and son who are in Indonesia and his mother who is in India require his financial support.
4. I do not regard that to be sufficient reason for me to exercise my discretion on humanitarian ground to reduce his sentence. As I have said, the sentence is already on the lower end of the range. There is no ground at all for interference with the sentence in this case. The appeal is therefore dismissed.
| (V. Bokhary) | |
| Judge of the Court of First Instance | |
| High Court |
Representation:
Appellant in person.
Miss Ada Chan, Government Counsel of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent.