HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Miscellaneous Proceedings (Civil)2003

THE DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION v. LAU FONG

Related cases with same parties

  • CACV108/1999LAU KONG YUNG v. THE DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION
  • CACV109/1999LAU KONG YUNG v. THE DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION
  • CACV113/1986THE DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION v. CHEUNG YUK SAI
  • CACV144/1985YIP CHI LIN v. THE DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION
  • CACV162/1992HO MING SAI AND OTHERS v. THE DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION
  • CACV168/1992CHAN HEUNG MUI AND OTHERS v. THE DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION
  • CACV169/1992HUI KAT FAN AND OTHERS v. THE DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION
  • CACV20/1986CHEN CHIU LIN v. THE DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION
  • CACV203/1997CHEUNG LAI WAH v. THE DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION
  • CACV210/1996VO THI DO and 1240 Others v. THE DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION
  • CACV216/1997NG KA LING AND ANOTHER v. THE DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION
  • CACV217/1997TSUI KUEN NANG v. THE DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION
  • CACV218/1997YEUNG NI NI v. THE DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION
  • CACV221/2018SHOVE SHERPA v. THE DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION
  • CACV260/2001PREM SINGH v. THE DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION
  • CACV272/2006MAURA JULIET A. RAQUIZA v. THE DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION
  • CACV287/2000LAU FONG v. THE DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION
  • CACV301/1999XIE XIAOYI v. THE DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION
  • CACV40/1998CHAN KAM NGA AND OTHERS v. THE DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION
  • CACV415/2000NG SIU TUNG AND OTHERS v. THE DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION
34917-EN-2003-07-17

THE DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION v. LAU FONG

HTML content

FAMV000014/2003

FAMV No.14 of 2003

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 14 OF 2003 (CIVIL)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM CACV NO. 287 OF 2000)

_____________________

Between:
THE DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATIONApplicant
AND
LAU FONGRespondent

_____________________

Appeal Committee: Chief Justice Li, Mr Justice Bokhary PJ and Mr Justice Chan PJ

Date of Hearing: 17 July 2003

Date of Determination: 17 July 2003

_____________________________

DETERMINATION

_____________________________

Chief Justice Li:

1. There are arguable points of general and public importance and we grant leave to appeal. On the appeal, all points would have to be ventilated, including the various possible statutory powers to deal with alleged fraud and in relation each of them, the appropriate procedure, the standard of satisfaction by the decision maker and the standard of judicial intervention.

2. We note that the Respondent is on legal aid. Legal Aid should continue and despite Mr Pun's ability, the Director of Legal Aid would presumably consider it appropriate to instruct leading counsel on a matter of such importance.

3. We note Mr Pannick has stated that the Director of Immigration is bound by the Court of Appeal's judgment. Therefore, the Respondent would have the right to enter Hong Kong after travelling outside Hong Kong on the basis of the present extant permission to stay which I believe would only expire in early 2005.

(Andrew Li)(Kemal Bokhary)(Patrick Chan)
Chief JusticePermanent JudgePermanent Judge

Representation:

Mr David Pannick QC and Mr William Marshall SC (instructed by the Department of Justice) for the applicant

Mr Hectar Pun (instructed by Messrs Patrick Wu & Co. and assigned by the Legal Aid Department) for the respondent