HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Miscellaneous Proceedings (Civil)2003

TOWN PLANNING BOARD v. SOCIETY FOR PROTECTION OF THE HARBOUR LTD

Related cases with same parties

  • CACV106/2006SMART GAIN INVESTMENT LTD v. TOWN PLANNING BOARD
  • CACV127/2012TOWN PLANNING BOARD v. ORIENTAL GENERATION LTD
  • CACV129/2012ORIENTAL GENERATION LTD v. TOWN PLANNING BOARD
  • CACV194/1995KWAN KONG CO LTD v. TOWN PLANNING BOARD
  • CACV232/2012HYSAN DEVELOPMENT CO LTD AND OTHERS v. TOWN PLANNING BOARD
  • CACV233/2012LEIGHTON PROPERTY CO LTD AND ANOTHER v. TOWN PLANNING BOARD
  • CACV25/2014TOWN PLANNING BOARD v. TOWN PLANNING APPEAL BOARD
  • CACV255/2011TURBO TOP LTD v. TOWN PLANNING BOARD
  • CACV256/2011TURBO TOP LTD v. TOWN PLANNING BOARD
  • CACV356/2006FINE TOWER ASSOCIATES LTD v. TOWN PLANNING BOARD
  • CACV386/2005CAPITAL RICH DEVELOPMENT LTD AND ANOTHER v. TOWN PLANNING BOARD
  • CACV398/2006UNITED GRAND LTD v. TOWN PLANNING BOARD
  • CACV432/2020HONG KONG RESORT CO LTD v. TOWN PLANNING BOARD
  • CACV48/2019TUNG CHUN CO LTD v. TOWN PLANNING BOARD
  • CACV49/2019TUNG CHUN CO LTD v. TOWN PLANNING BOARD
  • CACV50/2019TUNG CHUN CO LTD v. TOWN PLANNING BOARD
  • CACV540/2020TAM HOI PONG v. TOWN PLANNING BOARD
  • FACV14/2003TOWN PLANNING BOARD v. SOCIETY FOR PROTECTION OF THE HARBOUR LTD
  • FACV21/2015HYSAN DEVELOPMENT CO LTD AND OTHERS v. TOWN PLANNING BOARD
  • FACV22/2015LEIGHTON PROPERTY CO LTD AND ANOTHER v. TOWN PLANNING BOARD
34730-EN-2003-09-29

TOWN PLANNING BOARD v. SOCIETY FOR PROTECTION OF THE HARBOUR LTD

HTML content

FAMV000026/2003

FAMV No. 26 of 2003

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 26 OF 2003 (CIVIL)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL
FROM HCAL NO. 19 OF 2003)

_____________________

Between:
TOWN PLANNING BOARDApplicant
SOCIETY FOR PROTECTION OF THE HARBOUR LIMITEDRespondent

_____________________

Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Bokhary PJ, Mr Justice Chan PJ and Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ

Date of Determination: 29 September 2003

_________________________________

DETERMINATION

_________________________________

Mr Justice Bokhary PJ:

1. This application is the first of its kind. It is an application for leave to bring a civil appeal directly from the Court of First Instance of the High Court to the Court of Final Appeal. Provision for such "leap-frog" appeals is made by the recently introduced Division 3 of Part II of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance, Cap. 484. The trial judge has issued the necessary certificate. We are satisfied that this case involves a question of law which, by reason of its great public importance, ought to be submitted to the Court of Final Appeal for decision. And we are also satisfied that such decision is so urgently required that a "leap-frog" appeal is warranted. The respondent society consented to the certificate. It also consents to leave to appeal. Exercising our power to do so without an oral hearing, we grant leave to bring such an appeal.

2. An early hearing of the appeal being highly desirable, we have invited the parties to endeavour to agree an expedited procedural time-table. They have achieved such agreement. Their proposal is set out in a letter dated 13 September 2003 from the Department of Justice to the Registrar. Quoting from that letter, we direct the following time-table:

"

7 OctoberBoard to file and serve Notice of Appeal (rr14 and 16)
Board to file Affidavit of Service (rl6(b))
10 OctoberBoard to file and serve Part A of Record (r 32)
27 OctoberBoard to file and serve its Case (r25)
24 NovemberSociety to file and serve its Case (r26)
26 NovemberBoard to send proposed index for Part B of Record to Society for comment (r33)
3 DecemberSociety to provide comments, if any, on draft index to Part B Board to submit agreed Part B of Record to Registrar for approval (r36)
5 DecemberBoard to file and serve approved Part B of Record (r37)
Parties to file and serve lists of authorities (r42)."

3. The parties have indicated that six hearing days will probably be needed, and have requested six working days during the period 9 to 19 December 2003. This appeal will be set down for hearing on the six working days 9-12, 15 and 16 December 2003.

(Kemal Bokhary)(Patrick Chan)(R.A.V. Ribeiro)
Permanent JudgePermanent JudgePermanent Judge

Representation:

Written submissions from Mr Robert Tang SC and Mr Nicholas Cooney (instructed by Department of Justice) for the applicant

The respondent consented to the application