CHINA-TECH ENGINEERING (INT’L) LTD. v. JET HAVEN LTD.

HCCT 98/2003

 

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTRUCTION AND ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS

NO. 98 OF 2003

____________

BETWEEN

	CHINA-TECH ENGINEERING (INT’L) LTD.	Plaintiff
	and
	JET HAVEN LTD.	Defendant

____________

Before: Hon Reyes J in Court

Date of Hearing: 12 July 2006

Date of Judgment: 12 July 2006

______________

J U D G M E N T

______________

 

1.  China-Tech was Jet Haven's ELV system sub-contractor on 2 projects, one at Ma On Shan (MOS), the other at Kau To Shan (KTS).  China-Tech claims a balance of $1,427,613.50 said to be outstanding from Jet-Haven in respect of work on the MOS and KTS projects.

2.  By its pleading, Jet Haven denies liability.  It contends that the parties never agreed a sum for the 2 projects and their variation orders.  Jet Haven further disputes certain variations claimed by China-Tech, arguing that such constituted part of China-Tech's originally agreed work.

3.  Jet Haven also says that work done by China-Tech was defective.  Jet Haven counterclaims for $1,193,236.08.  Jet Haven contends that such amount represents what it had to pay another sub-contractor to remedy China-Tech's defective work.

4.  Jet Haven did not appear at trial.  China-Tech accordingly proceeded to prove its case by calling 3 witnesses. 

5.  On the basis of the evidence of those witnesses, I am satisfied that China-Tech is entitled to its claimed amount. 

6.  I accept China-Tech's case in relation to variation work. I accept that any work defects were subsequently rectified by China-Tech to Jet Haven's satisfaction. 

7.  I do not accept that Jet Haven had to engage an alternative sub-contractor to remedy China-Tech's work.

8.  In those premises, there will be judgment for China-Tech for $1,427,613.50.  Interest will run on that amount from date of writ to today at 1% over Hong Kong prime rate.  Thereafter, interest will run on the judgment sum at the judgment rate until payment.  Jet Haven’s counterclaim is dismissed.

9.  China-Tech will have the costs of this action, save that there will be no order in respect of the costs of its Summons to adduce the witness statement of Leung Chi Kai Mintis out of time. Costs are to be taxed if not agreed.

 

(A.T. Reyes) Judge of the Court of First Instance High Court

 

Mr Herbert Y. F. Leung, instructed by Messrs T. K. Cheng & Co., for the Plaintiff

Defendant in person – absent