HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Criminal Appeal2004

HKSAR v. LIU WAH KING

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
44571-EN-2004-08-03

HKSAR v. LIU WAH KING

HTML content

CACC 88/2004

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF APPEAL

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 88 OF 2004

(ON APPEAL FROM DCCC NO. 37 OF 2004)

----------------------

BETWEEN

HKSARRespondent
and
LIU WAH KING 廖華經Applicant

--------------------

Before : Hon Stock JA in Court

Dates of Hearing : 3 August 2004

Date of Judgment : 3 August 2004

----------------------

J U D G M E N T

----------------------

Hon Stock JA:

1. I shall grant the applicant leave in this case simply because, on balance, I think that the point that he raises deserves to be heard.  I have made it clear to him that that is not to be equated with any assessment of his chances of success.  The point that seems to me deserves a hearing is his comparison with the case of R v Chan Sui-to and another [1996] 2 HKCLR 128. 

 

 

(Frank Stock)
Justice of Appeal

 

Applicant, LIU WAH KING, in person

Mr Jackson Poon, SGC of the Department of Justice for the Respondent