HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Miscellaneous Proceedings (Criminal)2004

LEUNG CHI KEUNG v. HKSAR

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
40515-EN-2004-07-20

LEUNG CHI KEUNG v. HKSAR

HTML content

FAMC000024/2004

FAMC No. 24 of 2004

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 24 OF 2004 (CRIMINAL)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL
FROM HCMA NO. 939 OF 2003)

_____________________

Between:
LEUNG CHI KEUNGApplicant
AND
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGIONRespondent

_____________________

Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Bokhary PJ, Mr Justice Chan PJ and Sir Derek Cons NPJ

Date of Hearing: 20 July 2004

Date of Determination: 20 July 2004

_________________________

D E T E R M I N A T I O N

_________________________

Mr Justice Bokhary PJ:

1. The applicant seeks leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal on both limbs of s.32(2) of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal Ordinance, Cap. 484. Under the first limb, we certify the involvement of a point of law of great and general importance, being the one raised by the question of whether genuine distress on the part of an alleged victim of sexual abuse is relevant to negative a suggestion by the defence that the alleged victim's account is a fantasy.

2. Under the second limb, we are of the view that it is reasonably arguable that a substantial and grave injustice was done to the applicant by the admission of evidence of the alleged victim's good character.

3. We grant the applicant leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal under both limbs of s.32(2).

(Kemal Bokhary)(Patrick Chan)(Sir Derek Cons)
Permanent JudgePermanent JudgeNon-Permanent Judge

Representation:

Mr Wong Man Kit SC & Mr Luk King Wang (instructed by Messrs Au-Yueng, Cheng, Ho & Tin) for the appellant

Mr Cheung Wai-sun & Miss Winnie Lam (instructed by the Department of Justice) for the respondent