HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Constitutional and Administrative Law Proceedings2004

DANYAL-UL-AMJAD v. IMMIGRATION DEPARTMENT [Decision on Leave Application]

Related cases with same parties

  • HCAL180/2018NAWAZ KHAN QURESHI v. IMMIGRATION DEPARTMENT [Decision on Leave Application]
  • HCAL265/2018RE CORDOVAL MYRNA BENIASEN AND ANOTHER
  • HCAL266/2018MANUEL AMELYN TORRES v. IMMIGRATION DEPARTMENT [Decision on Leave Application]
  • HCAL267/2018RE AHMED WAQAR
  • HCAL270/2018KUNDIANA AND ANOTHER v. IMMIGRATION DEPARTMENT [Decision on Leave Application]
  • HCAL300/2018RE SHIVJIT SINGH
  • HCAL334/2018MIZANUR RAHMAN v. IMMIGRATION DEPARTMENT [Decision on Leave Application]
  • HCAL357/2018PHAM VAN HUNG v. IMMIGRATION DEPARTMENT [Decision on Leave Application]
  • HCAL373/2018RE NGUYEN XUAN DIU
  • HCAL41/2004ANIS-UL-AMJAD v. IMMIGRATION DEPARTMENT [Decision on Leave Application]
  • HCAL42/2004AMJAD-UL-MAHMOOND v. IMMIGRATION DEPARTMENT [Decision on Leave Application]
  • HCAL437/2018MATBAGAN IMELDA MANODEN v. IMMIGRATION DEPARTMENT [Decision on Leave Application]
  • HCAL438/2018LAGUISAN CATALINA BUNHIYAN v. IMMIGRATION DEPARTMENT [Decision on Leave Application]
  • HCAL451/2018SHAMS UL QAMAR v. IMMIGRATION DEPARTMENT [Decision on Leave Application]
  • HCAL466/2018RE SULEKHAH AND ANOTHER
  • HCAL473/2018RE TICUALA ISABEL MAGNA SAY EO
  • HCAL505/2018RE CUNANAN BELLA SAMILING
  • HCAL582/2018RE BINDER SINGH
  • HCAL583/2018RE ZEESHAN UL HAQ
  • HCAL684/2020FAZAL UR REHMAN v. IMMIGRATION DEPARTMENT [Decision on Leave Application]
[2025] HKCFI 5822-EN-2025-12-03

DANYAL-UL-AMJAD v. IMMIGRATION DEPARTMENT [Decision on Leave Application]

HTML content

HCAL 40/2004

[2025] HKCFI 5822

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST No. 40 of 2004

BETWEEN

 Danyal-Ul-AmjadApplicant
 與 and 
 Immigration DepartmentPutative Respondent

Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review
NOTIFICATION of the Judge’s decision (Ord. 53 r. 3)

Following:

   consideration of the documents only;       or
  consideration of the documents and oral submission by the applicant in court;

Order by The Honourable Mr Justice Coleman :

The Applicant’s application for leave to apply for judicial review is dismissed.  I make no order as to costs.

Observations for the Applicant :

Refer to the directions ofthe Honourable Mr Justice Coleman dated 11 November 2025.

Dated the 3rd day of December 2025.

  (Alvin Kwok)
for Registrar, High Court

Where leave to apply has been granted, Applicants and their legal advisers are reminded of their obligation to reconsider the merits of their application in the light of the Respondent’s evidence




Notes for the Applicant:

If leave has been granted, the Applicant or his solicitors must:

     
a) serve on the respondent and such interested parties as may be directed by the Court the order granting leave and any directions given within 14 days after the leave was granted (Order 53, rule 4A);

b) issue the originating summons within 14 days after the grant of leave and serve it in accordance with Order 53, rule 5; and

c) supply to every other party copies of every affidavit which the Applicant proposes to use at the hearing, including the affidavit in support of the application for leave (Order 53, rule 6(5)).
  Sent/Handed to the Applicant/the Applicant’s solicitors on 3/12/2025

Danyal-Ul-Amjad
The Applicant
Ref.: Nil



Form CALL-1