HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Companies Winding-up Proceedings2004

有關榮生工程有限公司(Daily Win Engineering Ltd)的事宜

Files (2)

44051-EN-2004-12-15

RE DAILY WIN ENGINEERING LTD

HTML content

HCCW 344/2004

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 344 OF 2004

____________

IN THE MATTER of the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32)
and
IN THE MATTER of DAILY WIN ENGINEERING LIMITED

____________

Before: Hon Kwan J in Chambers

Date of Hearing: 15 December 2004

Date of Decision: 15 December 2004

 

_____________

D E C I S I O N

_____________

 

1.  This is a summons issued by the liquidators of Daily Win Engineering Limited (“the Company”) under section 209A of the Companies Ordinance, Cap. 32, for an order that the compulsory liquidation of the Company be converted to a creditors’ voluntary winding up.  The summons was served on the Official Receiver.

2.  A creditor’s petition was presented to wind up the Company on 19 March 2004.  The winding-up order was made upon the petition on 26 July 2004 and the Official Receiver was the provisional liquidator.  The liquidators were appointed by an order dated 4 October 2004.

3.  The first meeting of creditors was held on 27 August 2004.  It was resolved inter alia that the winding up of the Company be conducted as if it were a creditors’ voluntary winding up under section 209A.

4.  On 3 September 2004, at the adjourned first meeting of contributories, a resolution was also passed for the conversion of the compulsory winding up to a creditors’ voluntary winding up.

5.  The main reason for this was to save the costs of the Official Receiver.

6.  A statement of affairs has been submitted by the directors on 17 September 2004.  The known assets of the Company consisted of the Company’s office equipment and an award in an arbitration of the estimated sum of HK$3.4 million.  As for liabilities, 26 proofs of debt in the aggregate sum of about HK$11.3 million have been received.

7.  The liquidators have filed an affirmation dealing with the matters to which the court would have regard in section 209A(2).  They are not aware of any matters of public concern which would require investigation in this liquidation.

8.  The Official Receiver does not take any position on this application and has not appeared. 

9.  In the circumstances, I will grant the application and order that the compulsory winding up be converted to a creditors’ voluntary winding up.  The costs of and occasioned by this application are to be treated as liquidation expenses of the Company.  

(S Kwan)
Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court

 

Mr Ivan Cheung, instructed by Messrs K H Lam &Co., for the Applicants

The Official Receiver, absent

39472-CH-2004-07-26

有關榮生工程有限公司(Daily Win Engineering Ltd)的事宜

HTML content

HCCW000344/2004

HCCW 344/2004

香港特別行政區

高等法院原訟法庭

民事司法管轄權

高院公司清盤案件編號2004年344號

____________

有關榮生工程有限公司(Daily Win Engineering Limited)的事宜

及

有關香港法例第32章《公司條例》的事宜

____________

主審法官:高等法院原訟法庭法官關淑馨

聆訊日期:2004年7月26日

判案書日期:2004年7月26日

____________

判案書

____________

1. 這個呈請由南洋商業銀行有限公司提出,要求法庭就榮生工程有限公司(簡稱“公司”)作出清盤命令。呈請人在高等法院雜項案件2003年第1675號取得得直判決,法庭在2003年7月7日裁定,公司需要向呈請人支付的款項為HK$2,587,278.12,附帶利息及釐定的訟費HK$28,750.00。

2. 2003年12月29日,呈請人就上述的債項,向公司發出要求償債書。由於公司未能支付,呈請人遂在2004年3月19日入禀法院,要求對公司清盤。自2004年5月24日,呈請的聆訊延期數次,今天已是第五次的聆訊,原因是公司與康翠台的業主立案法團進行仲裁訴訟,2004年5月6日仲裁官通知與訟雙方,他將於28天之內作出仲裁結果。其後,仲裁官又要求雙方作出進一步的書面陳述,故此延遲裁決,直至2004年7月9日,仲裁官才去信雙方的律師,表示已作出裁決。依照手續,雙方需要支付仲裁的費用,合共為HK$578,250.00,才可取得仲裁官的裁決。

3. 代表公司的董事廖慈偉先生向本席表示,公司已盡全力希望籌得約HK$290,000.00,以支付公司需要支付仲裁費用的一半,但其努力並不成功。

4. 2004年7月22日,公司去信呈請人,要求呈請人墊支部分需須的費用,好能盡早取得仲裁的裁決,以償還公司所欠呈請人的債項。呈請人拒絕作出任何墊支,也反對公司再把呈請押後。本席認為,公司已有充分的機會去籌措所需支付仲裁的費用。再者,公司也未能提出任何具體方案,以借貸或其他形式,籌集所需的金額。

5. 在這情況下,由於呈請人的債項並無爭議,而公司也無力償還,本席認為必須對公司作出清盤命令,呈請人的訟費將由公司的資產支付。

(關淑馨)
高等法院原訟法庭法官

呈請人:由廖陳林律師事務所轉聘杜美玉大律師代表出席

榮生工程有限公司:由董事廖慈偉先生代表出席

破產管理署:由姚定莊大律師代表出席