HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal2004

HKSAR v. LAM CHI ON

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN

Files (2)

40310-EN-2004-06-07

HKSAR v. LAM CHI ON

HTML content

HCMA000282A/2004

HCMA282/2004

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO.282 OF 2004

(ON APPEAL FROM TWCC3939 OF 2003)

---------------------

BETWEEN
HKSARRespondent
AND
LAM CHI ON (林子安)Appellant

----------------------

Coram: Deputy High Court Judge Fung in Court

Date of Hearing: 7 June 2004

Date of Decision: 7 June 2004

-------------------------

D E C I S I O N

-------------------------

1. The appellant Lam Chi On was acquitted on a charge of common assault before a magistrate, but she was ordered to be bound over in the sum of $1,000 for one year to be of good behaviour. She appealed against the order of the magistrate. Save as to the terms of the order, I have dismissed her appeal. She now applies under section 32 of the Court of Final Appeal Ordinance, Cap. 484, for me to certify that the decision involved a point of law of great and general importance.

2. She has filed a notice of motion. The six grounds in the notice of motion are concerned basically with matters of evidence as to which the magistrate should not have rejected her evidence; and that she was robbed and assaulted by the prosecution witnesses.

3. I hold that no point of law of great and general importance is involved in the decision and hence the application is refused.

(B. Fung)
Deputy High Court Judge

Representation:

Mr David Leung, SGC of Department of Justice, for the Respondent

The Appellant, in person

27340-EN-2004-04-21

HKSAR v. LAM CHI ON

HTML content