HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal2004

HKSAR v. LAU YIU MING

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
40428-EN-2004-05-25

HKSAR v. LAU YIU MING

HTML content

HCMA000432/2004

HCMA 432/2004

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 432 OF 2004

(ON APPEAL FROM FLCC 409/2004)

____________

BETWEEN
HKSARRespondent
AND
LAU YIU MINGAppellant

____________

Coram: The Honourable Mrs Justice V. Bokhary in Court

Date of Hearing: 25 May 2004

Date of Judgment: 25 May 2004

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

1. The Appellant has put forward very detailed and lengthy submissions in respect of his appeal against his two convictions: one for failing to comply with a traffic signal; and the other of driving a motor vehicle with an alcohol concentration in breath which exceeded the prescribed limit. I have given careful consideration to all his submissions. Having considered them and having considered what the Magistrate said in his Statement of Findings, I am of the view that the Magistrate was entitled to convict the Appellant of both offences, and that there is no basis on which I can interfere with either conviction.

2. This appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

(V. Bokhary)
Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court

Representation:

Miss June CHEUNG, GC, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent

Appellant in person