HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal2004

HKSAR v. CHU SIU WAI JOVIE

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
43126-EN-2004-08-25

HKSAR v. CHU SIU WAI JOVIE

HTML content

HCMA481/2004


IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO.481 OF 2004

(ON APPEAL FROM TWCC 646 OF 2004)

---------------------------

BETWEEN

 HKSARRespondent
 and 
 CHU SIU WAI JOVIE (朱兆蔚)Appellant

-----------------

Before : Hon Nguyen J in Court

Date of Hearing : 25 August 2004

Date of Judgment : 25 August 2004

-----------------------

JUDGMENT

-----------------------

1. The magistrate heard the evidence of all the witnesses including that of the appellant.  He also observed the demeanor of the witnesses when they gave evidence.  I have not had that opportunity and this appeal hearing is only based on the transcript which has been transcribed and the magistrate’s Statement of Findings.

2. I cannot see any ground for saying that the magistrate was wrong to have accepted the evidence of PW1 and PW2, the complainant and a police officer and to have rejected the evidence of the appellant.  I can see from the record no lurking doubt about the conviction.  The appeal against conviction is dismissed.

3. I grant the appellant leave to appeal against sentence out of time.

4. The appeal against sentence is allowed to the extent that the fine of $1,000 is reduced to $250 which is the maximum penalty provided for in section 28(2) of Cap.228.

5. The balance of the fine already paid, namely $750, is to be refunded to the appellant.

 (Peter Nguyen)
 Judge of the Court of First Instance
 High Court

                                                                   

Ms Evelyn Tsang, GC of the Department of Justice, for HKSAR

Appellant in person