HKSAR v. NGAI SIN FAT
HTML content
HCMA000553/2004
HCMA553/2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
(Appellate Jurisdiction)
MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO.553 OF 2004
(ON APPEAL FROM STCC 528 OF 2004)
---------------------
| BETWEEN | ||
| HKSAR | Respondent | |
| AND | ||
| NGAI SIN FAT (倪先發) | Appellant |
----------------------
Coram: Deputy High Court Judge D. Pang in Court
Date of Hearing: 15 July 2004
Date of Judgment: 15 July 2004
-------------------------
J U D G M E N T
-------------------------
1. The appellant was convicted on his own plea of one charge of 'Possession of Apparatus Fit and Intended for the Injection of Dangerous Drugs', contrary to sections 36(1) and (2) of the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance, Cap.134. He was sentenced to six months' imprisonment. He now appeals against sentence.
2. The facts were that the appellant was found collapsed in the toilet of his home. When the police arrived, they found beside the appellant a syringe containing traces of blood and suspected dangerous drugs later confirmed to be midazolam. A fresh needle mark was found at the inner side of his right thigh. Subsequently, the appellant admitted possession of the syringe for injecting dangerous drugs under caution.
3. Having alluded to fact that the appellant had 27 previous convictions 20 of which were drug related, and that he was not recommended for admission to a Drug Addiction Treatment Centre, the magistrate had this to say about sentence :
"The most powerful mitigation factor in the appellant's favour is his guilty plea.
He is a repeated drugs offender. I considered 9 months is an appropriate starting point. In view of his guilty plea, I reduced to 6 months."
4. Today, the complaint against the magistrate is that she had, without stating any reason, departed from the tariff, which is three months' imprisonment, after plea and without any aggravating factor : R. v. Law Sing, MA890/1996; HKSAR v. Lee Sheung Chuen, HCMA 109/2001.
5. The respondent concedes that the sentence is against the weight of the authorities.
6. The appeal is allowed. The sentence of six months is set aside. A term of three months is substituted.
| ( D. Pang ) | |
| Deputy High Court Judge |
Representation:
Ms Mary Sin, SADPP of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent
Mr Fan Shun Yan, Edward, instructed by the Director of Legal Aid, for the Appellant