HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal2004

HKSAR v. WONG KU

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
42769-EN-2004-08-26

HKSAR v. WONG KU

HTML content

HCMA000704/2004

HCMA 704/2004

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 704 OF 2004

(ON APPEAL FROM KCCC 5614/2004)

____________

BETWEEN
HKSARRespondent
AND
WONG KUAppellant

____________

Coram: Deputy High Court Judge Wright in Court

Date of Hearing: 26 August 2004

Date of Judgment: 26 August 2004

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

1. The Appellant was convicted after trial of a single charge of injecting a dangerous drug.

2. As he was entitled to do, the Magistrate accepted the evidence of the sole prosecution witness but rejected that of the Appellant. On that evidence the conviction was inevitable.

3. The appeal is dismissed.

(A R Wright)
Deputy High Court Judge

Representation:

Ms Vivien Chan, GC, for Respondent

Wong Ku, in person