HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Miscellaneous Proceedings (Criminal)2005

HKSAR v. LUK CHIU KI

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
45241-EN-2005-05-23

HKSAR v. LUK CHIU KI

HTML content

FAMC No. 15 of 2005

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 15 OF 2005 (Criminal)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM
HCMA No. 1058 of 2004)

_______________________

Between:

hksarRespondent
and
LUK CHIU KIApplicant

_______________________

Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Bokhary, Mr Justice Chan PJ and Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ

Date of Hearing: 23 May 2005

Date of Determination: 23 May 2005

 

_______________________

DETERMINATION

_______________________

 

Mr Justice Bokhary PJ:

1.  It is a very sad case, but we see no basis for allowing the matter to proceed to the Court of Final Appeal.  On a selective reading, it is possible to conceive the notion that the magistrate may have misunderstood the evidence.  But on a fair reading, the argument to that effect is impossible.  It is said also that there is no reason why the applicant would commit an offence like this.  There is certainly no good reason why he would.  But the experience of the courts is that seemingly respectable people do sometimes commit offences, risking a great deal for very little gain and running great risks.

2.  It is, as we have said, a very sad case.  But there simply is no basis for allowing the matter to proceed any further.  The application for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal is dismissed.

(Kemal Bokhary)
Permanent Judge
(Patrick Chan)
Permanent Judge
(R A V Ribeiro)
Permanent Judge

Mr Allen Lam (instructed by Messrs Waller Ma Huang & Yeung) for the applicant

Ms Louisa Lai (of the Department of Justice) for the respondent