RE AMERY CONSTRUCTION WATERPROOFING CO, LTD
HTML content
HCCW893/2002
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 893 OF 2002
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF HOPLIK CARTON PAPER FACTORY LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW1298/2002
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 1298 OF 2002
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF KIN LEE KO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW308/2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 308 OF 2004
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF PROMINENCE REALTY (INTERNATIONAL) LIIMITED |
__________________
HCCW352/2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 352 OF 2004
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF WEALTH FORD INVESTMENT LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW385/2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 385 OF 2004
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF LEADER ALUMINIUM (ENGINEERING) COMPANY LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW439/2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 439 OF 2004
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| N THE MATTER OF EARNSMATE LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW505/2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 505 OF 2004
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF TCM DEVELOPMENT CO LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW556/2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 556 OF 2004
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF TATTUNE DEVELOPMENT LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW565/2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 565 OF 2004
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF VICTY LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW721/2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 721 OF 2004
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF VICTORIOUS CARGO LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW722/2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 722 OF 2004
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF KOOLL INTERNATIONAL CONSOLIDATED SERVICES LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW727/2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 727 OF 2004
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF LUCKY AWARD LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW762/2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 762 OF 2004
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF TRIMLY HOST LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW781/2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 781 OF 2004
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF MIKURA LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW836/2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 836 OF 2004
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF POWER PACKING & REMOVAL COMPANY LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW862/2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 862 OF 2004
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF BEPEAK LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW869/2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 869 OF 2004
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF CHOR LAU HEUNG RESTAURANT COMPANY LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW877/2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 877 OF 2004
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF DIAMOND EARN INVESTMENTS LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW884/2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 844 OF 2004
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF DIGITAL NUNET EXCHANGE LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW915/2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 915 OF 2004
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF NEW LINKAGE LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW966/2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 966 OF 2004
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF STANDARD WELL DEVELOPMENT LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW977/2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 977 OF 2004
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF VICTORY MARK INVESTMENT LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW1032/2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 1032 OF 2004
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF KEEN PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW1084/2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 1084 OF 2004
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF ACEVINYL PRODUCTS INDUSTRIAL COMPANY LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW1096/2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 1096 OF 2004
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF SAGGIO (HONG KONG) COMPANY LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW1131/2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 1134 OF 2004
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF JOINTEK CONSULTANTS LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW1167/2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 1167 OF 2004
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF JOYCA DEVELOPMENT LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW1190/2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 1190 OF 2004
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF XINDAS ENTERPRISES LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW1254/2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 1254 OF 2004
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF OPESCO INVESTMENT LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW124/2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 124 OF 2005
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF AMERY CONSTRUCTION WATERPROOFING CO, LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW163/2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 163 OF 2005
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF JC INFINITIVE COMPANY LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW237/2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 237 OF 2005
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF FAITH DEE LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW238/2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 238 OF 2005
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF ALL FULL INVESTMENTS LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW344/2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 344 OF 2005
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF STANDARD CURTAIN FACTORY LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW361/2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 361 OF 2005
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF BEST CYCLE LIMITED |
__________________
HCCW366/2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 366 OF 2005
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF HIGHGROVE LIMITED |
____________________
HCCW402/2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 402 OF 2005
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF DRAGON PALACE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED |
____________________
HCCW410/2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 410 OF 2005
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF GOLDEN NICE INDUSTRIAL LIMITED |
____________________
HCCW419/2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 419 OF 2005
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF BESTIME TRADING LIMITED |
____________________
HCCW433/2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 433 OF 2005
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF ETC ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY LIMITED |
____________________
HCCW444/2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 433 OF 2005
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF YUE XIU METALS & MINERALS COMPANY LIMITED |
____________________
HCCW476/2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 476 OF 2005
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF SINOENERGY HOLDINGS LIMITED |
____________________
HCCW479/2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 479 OF 2005
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF MILLION FORTUNE INVESTMENT LIMITED |
____________________
HCCW495/2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 495 OF 2005
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF FIVE TOWNS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED |
____________________
HCCW529/2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 529 OF 2005
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF HONG KEE COMPANY LIMITED |
____________________
HCCW544/2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 544 OF 2005
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF SUN TUNG LOK CATERERS (MANAGEMENT & CONSULTANT) LIMITED |
____________________
HCCW554/2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 544 OF 2005
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF SITECH LIMITED |
____________________
HCCW566/2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 566 OF 2005
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF HOSEN INVESTMENT LIMITED |
____________________
HCCW613/2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 613 OF 2005
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF HONDEX PROPERTIES LIMITED |
____________________
HCCW686/2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 686 OF 2005
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF THE COUPLE DESIGN & PRODUCTION COMPANY LIMITED |
____________________
HCCW688/2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 688 OF 2005
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF PACIFIC (WING HONG) OFFSET PRINTING COMPANY LIMITED |
____________________
HCCW706/2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 706 OF 2005
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF ASIATEX INTERNATIONAL LIMITED |
____________________
HCCW725/2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 725 OF 2005
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF SUNRISE DESIGN & DECORATION (HK) LIMITED |
____________________
HCCW739/2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 739 OF 2005
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF SPENDERS IMAGE LIMITED |
____________________
HCCW758/2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 758 OF 2005
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF VICTORIA GARMENT MANUFACTURING COMPANY LIMITED |
____________________
HCCW804/2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 804 OF 2005
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF M & E ENGINEERING COMPANY LIMITED |
____________________
HCCW845/2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 845 OF 2005
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF O’CLASSIC INTERNATIONAL LIMITED |
____________________
HCCW867/2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 867 OF 2005
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF FRIENDS OF MINE GROUP LIMITED |
____________________
HCCW912/2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 912 OF 2005
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF WAYGAIN LIMITED |
____________________
HCCW918/2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 912 OF 2005
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF UNITED FAME ENTERPRISE LIMITED |
____________________
HCCW11/2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES (WINDING-UP) NO. 11 OF 2006
__________________
| IN THE MATTER OF the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER OF YUE SHING INDUSTRIAL LIMITED |
____________________
Before: Hon Harris J in Chambers
Date of Hearing: 27 July 2010
Date of Decision: 27 July 2010
----------------------
D E C I S I O N
----------------------
1. I have before me 61 summonses issued by the Official Receiver. The 61 applications are similar.
2. The Official Receiver seeks orders pursuant to sections 194, 196 and 204 of the Companies Ordinance that Mr Anthony Nedderman and, depending on which company is being considered, another member of his staff, be removed as liquidator from the subject company. In addition, the Official Receiver seeks orders that the fees of the liquidators in each case be disallowed; that the liquidators be at liberty to file for the approval of the court a schedule of disbursements within 14 days from the date of their delivery up of the books and documents of the companies, but in any event not later than two months from the date of the order; that the liquidators do, within 14 days from the date of the order, deliver over to the new provisional liquidators or liquidators all books kept by them and all other books, documents, papers and accounts in their possession relating to their office of provisional liquidator or liquidator; that Mr Kong Chi-hau, Johnson, and Mr Lo Siu-kei, both of BDO Limited, be appointed the joint and several provisional liquidators or liquidators of the companies as the case may be; and finally, that the Official Receiver’s costs of each application be paid by Mr Nedderman in the gross sum of $3,085.
3. The reason these 61 applications have become necessary is that Mr Nedderman appears to have recently left Hong Kong and has not put in place any arrangements to allow his company to continue to operate and for his co-liquidators to properly carry out their office. The assumption, which would appear to be reasonable on the basis of the evidence before me, is that he has left Hong Kong and has no intention of returning.
4. Section 196(1) of the Companies Ordinance provides that:
“A provisional liquidator or liquidator appointed under section 193 or 194 may resign or be removed by the court on cause being shown.”
The Official Receiver has locus to apply under section 196(1) of the Ordinance (see Liote Property Management Limited and Others [2006] 2 HKLRD 106) The burden is on the Official Receiver to show good cause for the removal of a provisional liquidator or liquidator. The statute confers a wide discretion on the court. Cause shown is not limited to misconduct or personal unfitness.
5. In Liote Property Management, Madam Justice Kwan, as she then was, described the court’s discretion in the following terms at page 108 G to I:
“The application for removal as provisional liquidators is made under s.196(1). By this provision, a provisional liquidator or liquidator appointed under ss.193 or 194 may be removed by the court “on cause shown”. The burden is on the Official Receiver to show a good cause for removal. This provision confers a wide discretion on the court. “Cause shown” is not limited to misconduct or personal unfitness. In the exercise of this discretion, the court may take all the circumstances into consideration and if the court finds it desirable on the whole that a liquidator should be removed, the court may remove him. (Re per Malins V-C). “Fair play to the liquidator himself is not to be left out of sight, but the measure of due cause as the substantial and real interest of the liquidation.”
6. As one would expect, the court has power to remove a liquidator in the interests of those with an interest in the assets without there being any personal misconduct or unfitness shown. (See Hong Kong Company Law Handbook 11th Edition 2009 Edition page 991.)
7. Clearly Mr Nedderman’s disappearance and the cessation of the operation of his company necessitate this application and an order by the court removing Mr Nedderman and his co-liquidator and replacing them with somebody who is able to properly carry out the office of provisional liquidator or liquidator as the case may be.
8. I have therefore made orders in the terms of the 61 applications before me. This includes disallowing Mr Nedderman’s fees as, given the failure on his part to carry out his office properly and the prejudice this has caused to the interests of the creditors of the company, in my view, it would be inappropriate to allow him to charge fees for the work that he has done to date.
9. The position is, as I have indicated by the terms of the application, different in the case of the disbursements of his company.
| (J Harris) Justice of the Court of First Instance High Court |
Miss Joyce Lam for the Official Receiver
Mr Anthony Nedderman, of Tony Nedderman & Co Ltd, the Provisional Liquidator or Liquidator (as the case may be) (in all 61 cases) (absent)
Mr Chin Kin-wah, of Tony Nedderman & Co Ltd, the Liquidator of (1) Hoplik Carton Paper Factory (in HCCW893/2002) and (2) Kin Lee Ko Construction Co Ltd (in HCCW1298/2002) (present)
Mr Yeung Alstone Yuk-man, of Tony Nedderman & Co Ltd, the Liquidators of Kooll International Consolidated Service Ltd (in HCCW722/2004) (present)
Ms Yan Miu-ping, of Tony Nedderman & Co Ltd, the Provisional Liquidator of (1) Victy Limited (in HCCW565/2004) and (2) ETC Environmental Technology Limited (in HCCW433/2005), and the Liquidator of the Companies (in the rest 56 cases) (absent)