HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Miscellaneous Proceedings (Criminal)2006

SIN KIT SANG v. HKSAR

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
53419-EN-2006-07-25

SIN KIT SANG v. HKSAR

HTML content

FAMC No. 30 of 2006

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 30 OF 2006 (CRIMINAL)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL
FROM HCMA NO. 1225 OF 2005)

_______________

Between

SIN KIT-SANGApplicant
and
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION Respondent

_______________

 

Appeal Committee : Mr Justice Bokhary PJ, Mr Justice Chan PJ and Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ

Date of Hearing : 25 July 2006

Date of Determination : 25 July 2006

 

_________________________

D E T E R M I N A T I O N

_________________________

Mr Justice Chan PJ:

1.  In support of his application for leave to appeal against the conviction of dangerous driving causing death on the substantial and grave injustice limb, the Applicant relies on 3 grounds of appeal.

2.  We are not persuaded that any of these grounds are reasonably arguable.

3.  We are not satisfied that the trial magistrate had wrongly misused the Road Users' Code or wrongly admitted or relied on the evidence of the expert witness called by the prosecution or that the magistrate was not entitled on the evidence to find that the applicant's driving fell far below that of a competent and careful driver and that it would be obvious to such a driver that such manner of driving was dangerous in the circumstances.  The application is dismissed.

(Kemal Bokhary)
Permanent Judge
(Patrick Chan)
Permanent Judge
(R A V Ribeiro)
Permanent Judge

Mr Daniel Marash, SC (instructed by Messrs Hau, Lau, Li & Yeung) for the Applicant

Miss Mary Sin (of the Department of Justice) for the Respondent