VIGOUR LTD v. HYUNDAI ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CO LTD
HTML content
FAMV No. 4 of 2006
IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 4 OF 2006 (CIVIL)
(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL
FROM CACV NO. 128 OF 2004)
_____________________
Between:
| VIGOUR LIMITED | Applicant | |
| and | ||
| HYUNDAI ENGINEERING AND |
_____________________
| Appeal Committee : | Mr Justice Bokhary PJ, Mr Justice Chan PJ and |
| Date of Hearing : | 22 May 2006 |
| Date of Determination : | 22 May 2006 |
______________________
DETERMINATION
______________________
Mr Justice Bokhary PJ:
The points of law put forward on behalf of the applicant are not reached in the peculiar circumstances of this case. We refrain from saying anything that might prejudge any of those points, which may yet reach the Court in some other case in the future. Leave to appeal is refused.
[The respondent seeking the costs of the application and the applicant not resisting them, those costs were awarded to the respondent.]
| (Kemal Bokhary) Permanent Judge | (Patrick Chan) Permanent Judge | (R.A.V. Ribeiro) Permanent Judge |
Mr Benjamin Yu SC and Mr Godfrey Lam (instructed by Messrs Woo, Kwan, Lee & Lo) for the applicant
Mr Michael Thomas SC (instructed by Messrs Masons) for the respondent