HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal2006

HKSAR v. JASPAL SINGH

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
51941-EN-2006-03-08

HKSAR v. JASPAL SINGH

HTML content

HCMA 100/2006

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. HCMA 100 OF 2006

(ON APPEAL FROM ESCC 5195 OF 2005)

______________________

BETWEEN

 HKSARRespondent
 and 
 JASPAL SINGHAppellant

____________

 

Before : Deputy High Court Judge Leong in Court

Date of Hearing : 8 March 2006

Date of Judgment : 8 March 2006

 

______________________

J U D G M E N T

______________________

 

1.  The appellant pleaded guilty to three offences: Breach of Condition of Stay, Using an Identity Card relating to another person and Theft.  He was sentenced to 15 months imprisonment on the charge of using an identity card relating to another person, and 2 months each on the remaining 2 charges, the sentences were to run concurrently.

2.  The facts as submitted by the appellant are these.  On 29 November 2005, the appellant was found by police in the street in a furtive manner.  On checking his identity card, the appellant said he lost his identity card and produced a security permit with his photograph on it.  Further investigation by the police at the police station revealed that the security permit belonged to another person who had lost it on a bus.  The Immigration Department confirmed that the appellant arrived on 25 November 2004 and was permitted to stay for 14 days only.  The appellant overstayed until 29 November 2005.  The appellant appeals against sentence.

3.  In his letter to the court, he said he accepted responsibility for what he did in Hong Kong, and that his family at home was very worried about him.  He asked for leniency.  And in court before me, he made the same plea.

4.  The sentences imposed by the magistrate are in all respect proper and non-excessive.  I see no reason to vary the sentences.  The appeal is dismissed.

 

 

 (Arthur Leong)
Deputy High Court Judge

 

Mr Steward Hau, SGC of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent

Appellant, in person