HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal2006

HKSAR v. CHEUNG WING CHE

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
54014-EN-2006-08-22

HKSAR v. CHEUNG WING CHE

HTML content

HCMA 678/2006

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 678 OF 2006

(ON APPEAL FROM ESS 34628 OF 2005)

____________

BETWEEN

HKSARRespondent
and
CHEUNG WING CHE (張榮志)Appellant

____________

Before: The Honourable Mrs Justice V. Bokhary in Court

Date of Hearing: 22 August 2006

Date of Judgment: 22 August 2006

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

 

1.  The Respondent conceded that the appeal ought to be allowed on the ground that the Deputy Special Magistrate had “stepped into the arena”.  In my view, this concession was properly made.  No doubt with the best intention, the Magistrate had indeed taken so active a part in the cross-examination of the Appellant as to have usurped the function of the prosecutor.  In the result, the trial cannot be regarded as fair. 

2.  Accordingly, the appeal is allowed to quash the conviction.

(V. Bokhary)
Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court

 

The Appellant, in person

Mr Raymond Cheng, GC of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent