HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal2006

HKSAR v. ERDENETSETSEG SANDAGDORJ AND ANOTHER

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
55184-EN-2006-10-06

HKSAR v. ERDENETSETSEG SANDAGDORJ AND ANOTHER

HTML content

HCMA851/2006

 

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 851 OF 2006

(ON APPEAL FROM KCCC 4684 OF 2006)

---------------------------

BETWEEN

HKSARRespondent
and
ERDENETSETSEG SANDAGDORJ1st Appellant
OTGONDAVAA BUMBALAI2nd Appellant

-------------------------

Before : Hon Nguyen J in Court

Date of Hearing : 6 October 2006

Date of Judgment : 6 October 2006

-----------------------

J U D G M E N T

-----------------------

1. The sentences imposed by the magistrate were neither manifestly excessive nor wrong in principle and were wholly appropriate.  However, the fact that the 2nd appellant is now pregnant for three months was not brought to the attention of the magistrate, nor was the fact that the 1st appellant’s mother who is looking after their three children, aged 9, 12 and 14 years is aged 76 and is suffering from bad health.  

2. In my view, the two appellants were clearly under the influence of their husbands when they assisted their husbands to commit the offence. 

3. For purely humanitarian reasons, I will reduce the sentence of each appellant by three months, and their appeals are allowed to that extent.

 ( Peter Nguyen )
Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court

Ms Kathie Cheung, GC of Department of Justice, for HKSAR

The 1st and 2nd Appellants in person, present