HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal2007

HKSAR v. FAHEEN CHAUDHRY MUHAMMAD

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
57099-EN-2007-05-11

HKSAR v. FAHEEN CHAUDHRY MUHAMMAD

HTML content

HCMA233/2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO.233 OF 2007

(ON APPEAL FROM KCCC 574 OF 2007)

---------------------------

BETWEEN

HKSARRespondent
and
FAHEEN CHAUDHRY MUHAMMADAppellant

---------------------------

Before : Deputy High Court Judge D. Pang in Court

Date of Hearing : 24 April 2007

Date of Judgment : 24 April 2007

Date of Reasons for Judgment : 11 May 2007

-----------------------------------------------------

Reasons  for  JUDGMENT

-----------------------------------------------------

1. The appellant was convicted on his own plea of one count of ‘remaining unlawfully’ contrary to section 38(1)(b) of the Immigration Ordinance, Cap. 115.  He was sentenced to 15 months’ imprisonment.  The appellant appeals against that sentence.             

2. At 9:10 p.m. on 18 January 2007, police officers were deployed to Pei Ho Street, Shamshuipo for a case of ‘drunk person’.  There they found the appellant who was either unable or unwilling to produce any document of identification.  It was only after he was taken to the hospital and had had some treatment that he surrendered his Pakistani passport for inspection.  It showed he left Pakistan on 21 November 2006 and arrived China on the 30th.  There was no further immigration record and the appellant admitted himself to be an illegal immigrant.  He has two previous convictions.

3. In the court below, the appellant had advanced all sorts of mitigation that the magistrate dismissed as either untrue or irrelevant.  Before me, he said he was a foreigner and did not know the offence would carry such a heavy penalty.  He also asked me to take into account the fact that his legs were broken.

4. Plainly, this appeal has no merit.  It is dismissed.

(D. Pang)
Deputy High Court Judge

  

Miss Winnie Lam, GC of Department of Justice, for HKSAR

Appellant in person, present