HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal2007

HKSAR v. YEAP BOUN LONG

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
57118-EN-2007-04-26

HKSAR v. YEAP BOUN LONG

HTML content

HCMA288/2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

(Appellate Jurisdiction)

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO.288 OF 2007

(ON APPEAL FROM STCC 1753 OF 2007)

---------------------------

BETWEEN

HKSARRespondent
and
YEAP BOUN LONG (葉文隆)Appellant

---------------------------

Before : Hon Nguyen J in Court

Date of Hearing : 26 April 2007

Date of Judgment : 26 April 2007

-----------------------

J U D G M E N T

-----------------------

1. The starting point of 18 months’ imprisonment for the two charges is neither manifestly excessive nor wrong in principle.

2. The magistrate gave a proper one-third discount for the pleas and reduced the sentences to 12 months.  The magistrate properly ordered that the two sentences are to be served concurrently.

3. The 12 months were ordered by the magistrate to be served consecutively to the 12 months the appellant was serving for another different and unrelated offence.  That is a proper order as the two sets of offences were committed on different dates and the offences were totally different.

4. The appeal against sentence is dismissed.

 

 

 (Peter Nguyen)
Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court

Mr Prakash L. Daryanani, SGC of Department of Justice, for HKSAR

Appellant in person