HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal2007

HKSAR v. ZHANG QING

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
56368-EN-2007-02-13

HKSAR v. ZHANG QING

HTML content

HCMA 73/2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 73 OF 2007

____________

HKSAR
and
ZHANG Qing

____________

 

Before: Hon Wright, J., in Court

Date of Hearing: 13 February 2007

Date of Judgment: 13 February 2007

_______________

JUDGMENT

_______________

 

1.  The appellant was charged with a single charge of theft.  A summary of facts was agreed by the appellant and admitted in evidence.  She gave no evidence and called no witnesses.  The magistrate recorded that he was satisfied that she had committed the act set out in the charge but without recording a conviction against her.

2.  He called for two psychiatric reports.  Each of the authors of those reports expressed the opinion that the appellant is suffering from schizophrenia marked by hallucinations and bizarre delusions.  Each recommended that she be made subject for a period of three months to a hospital order pursuant to s. 45 of the Mental Health Ordinance, Cap. 136.

3.  The magistrate correctly accepted that that was the appropriate manner of dealing with the appellant.  The appellant appeals the order which the magistrate made on the grounds that it is too severe.   Mr. Ng, who appears today for the appellant, sensibly accepts that he is unable to advance any argument on her behalf.  That order is the only sensible and effective way of disposing of this matter.  Consequently the order is confirmed and the appeal dismissed.

 

 

(A R WRIGHT)
Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court

 

Ms Christal Chan, Senior Government Counsel of the Department of Justice, for the HKSAR

Mr Alan Ng, instructed by M/s M L Tam & Co, on the instructions of the Director of Legal Aid, for the appellant.