HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal2007

HKSAR v. GUO YUYAN

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
59471-EN-2007-11-29

HKSAR v. GUO YUYAN

HTML content

HCMA909/2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 909 OF 2007

(ON APPEAL FROM STCC 6325 OF 2007)

______________________

BETWEEN

 HKSARRespondent
 and 
 GUO YUYAN (郭玉艷)Appellant

______________________

 

Before : Deputy High Court Judge Line in Court

Date of Hearing : 29 November 2007

Date of Judgment : 29 November 2007

 

______________________

J U D G M E N T

______________________

 

1.  This is an appeal against sentences of imprisonment totalling 15 months.  A 15-month sentence was imposed following a plea of guilty to using a forged identity card in circumstances where the Appellant had taken up work in Hong Kong unlawfully.  Concurrent sentences of 14 days’ imprisonment and 4 months’ imprisonment were imposed for breaches of condition of stay by overstaying and taking up employment.

2.  The sentence of 15 months’ imprisonment was in line with the guideline sentence set out in the case of Li Chang Li.  Of course, the guideline is not a straitjacket and the Appellant today has addressed me seeking to put forward reasons why I should depart from it.  She has told me of her husband being ill, her brother-in-law confined to bed, she being the sole breadwinner, of being cheated by the person who had got her to come here to work and of not realising the seriousness of using a forged identity card.

3.  I regret to say that the nature of what she has told me is very familiar.  It relates the sort of matters that people in her situation commonly suffer when they act as she has done and I regret to say that those matters do not carry such force as would justify a departure from the guideline.

4.  Accordingly, the appeal against sentence is dismissed.

 

 

 (P Line)
Deputy High Court Judge

 

Representations:

Ms Olivia Tsang, Senior Government Counsel (Ag.), of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent

Appellant: Guo Yuyan (郭玉艷), in person