HKSAR v. GUO YUYAN
HTML content
HCMA909/2007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 909 OF 2007
(ON APPEAL FROM STCC 6325 OF 2007)
______________________
BETWEEN
| HKSAR | Respondent | |
| and | ||
| GUO YUYAN (郭玉艷) | Appellant |
______________________
Before : Deputy High Court Judge Line in Court
Date of Hearing : 29 November 2007
Date of Judgment : 29 November 2007
______________________
J U D G M E N T
______________________
1. This is an appeal against sentences of imprisonment totalling 15 months. A 15-month sentence was imposed following a plea of guilty to using a forged identity card in circumstances where the Appellant had taken up work in Hong Kong unlawfully. Concurrent sentences of 14 days’ imprisonment and 4 months’ imprisonment were imposed for breaches of condition of stay by overstaying and taking up employment.
2. The sentence of 15 months’ imprisonment was in line with the guideline sentence set out in the case of Li Chang Li. Of course, the guideline is not a straitjacket and the Appellant today has addressed me seeking to put forward reasons why I should depart from it. She has told me of her husband being ill, her brother-in-law confined to bed, she being the sole breadwinner, of being cheated by the person who had got her to come here to work and of not realising the seriousness of using a forged identity card.
3. I regret to say that the nature of what she has told me is very familiar. It relates the sort of matters that people in her situation commonly suffer when they act as she has done and I regret to say that those matters do not carry such force as would justify a departure from the guideline.
4. Accordingly, the appeal against sentence is dismissed.
| (P Line) Deputy High Court Judge |
Representations:
Ms Olivia Tsang, Senior Government Counsel (Ag.), of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent
Appellant: Guo Yuyan (郭玉艷), in person