HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Miscellaneous Proceedings (Criminal)2008

CAI ZONG GANG v. HKSAR

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
61428-EN-2008-06-17

CAI ZONG GANG v. HKSAR

HTML content

FAMC No. 30 of 2008

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION 

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 30 OF 2008 (CRIMINAL)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL

FROM CACC NO. 486 OF 1998)

----------------------

BETWEEN  
 CAI ZONG GANGApplicant
 and 
 HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGIONRespondent

----------------------

Appeal Committee : Mr Justice Bokhary PJ, Mr Justice Chan PJ and Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ

Date of Hearing : 17 June 2008

Date of Determination : 17 June 2008

 

---------------------------------

D E T E R M I N A T I O N

---------------------------------

 

Mr Justice Bokhary PJ :

Having regard to all the circumstances, particularly what the recorder told the jury and what he omitted to tell them after they had purported to return a verdict by majority of 4 to 3, it is reasonably arguable that there was, in regard to their function and position, a departure from accepted norms to the applicant’s disadvantage sufficiently serious to constitute a substantial and grave injustice.  Accordingly leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal is granted on the substantial and grave injustice ground.

(Kemal Bokhary)(Patrick Chan)(RAV Ribeiro)
Permanent JudgePermanent JudgePermanent Judge

 

Mr Richard Wong Tat Wah (instructed by Messrs Haldanes and assigned by the Legal Aid Department) for the applicant

Ms Louisa Lai (of the Department of Justice) for the respondent